New Interseasonal Regatta: Co-op Size & Task # to Reach 5 Team Goals

[kitty4715]

Thought it might be helpful to start gathering info about everyone's co-op goals.

Please comment with the size of your co-op, number of Racing vs Non-Racing members this week (& if any non-racing are actively participating), number of Racing vs Non-Racing members during last week's seasonal race, and number of tasks you need to reach each of the 5 goals as you play.

Disclaimer: This chart is compiled from user provided data and may not be accurate. At this time, we don’t know what exact factors influence your goal numbers.

EDIT: OK, based on a few responses (Ex Post #15), it's possible racing status has some effect. A member's post in the other thread (shoutout to HelpersAllAboardSerenity) made me consider the idea that the system at first only considers "Racing" members to determine the goals, but as soon as a non-racing member picks up a task, it will adjust the future goals based on the "new" total including that person. Just a theory.

EDIT 2: New theory! Perhaps the number of active racers you had in the last race of the seasonal regatta (week right before interseasonal) determines the baseline for the co-op goals you will get during interseasonal challenge. See this post for more info. Once again, total speculatiion and I have very little evidence to support it, but it helps explain what my co-op experienced and what Mondayville experienced.

Total Team Size	Racers in Seasonal Week 4 Race	Racers (Inter- seasonal)	Non- Racers (Inter- seasonal)	Interseasonal Active Participants by End	Goal 1	Goal 2	Goal 3	Goal 4	Goal 5
1	1	1	0	1	2	4	7	11	17
1	2	1	0	1	3	7	13	21	33
2	2	2	0	2	3	7	13	21	33
3	?	3	0	3	3	7	13	25	43
4	?	4	0	3	6	14	25	41	?
4	?	3	1	4	?	?	?	?	65
5	5	5	0	5	8	18	32	52	82
7	6	4	3	7	9	21	38	62	104
7	6	6	1	5	10	23	41	67	111
7	?	6	1	7	?	?	43	71	113
8	?	6	2	?	?	?	62ish	87ish	103
9	6	6	3	7	9	21	41	69	111
9	?	5	4	6	?	?	?	?	98
9	?	9	0	?	12	30	55	91	145
10	?	9	1	10	13	30	54	94	154
10	?	9	1	?	11	26	48	80	128
12	?	8	4	9	?	?	?	66	120
12	?	11	1	?	?	?	?	?	187
13	?	1	12	3	3	7	13	21	39
14	6	6	8		7	30	54	88	139
16	?	9	7	?	6	27	49	?	129
16	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	189
17	?	17	0	17	24	57	104	172	273
17	?	12	5	?	?	?	?	?	188
19	27ish	14	5	14	40	94	?	?	?
20	10	13	7	17	20	43ish	87	151	252
22	13 out of 20	17	5		20ish	48	92	160	261
22	15	15	7		25	58	107	179	292
22	?	20	2	21	24	56	101	169	?
25	?	20	5	25	31	75	135	231	379
25	?	?	?	26 (1 joined mid race)	44	102	?	304	482
29	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	179	340
30	?	29	1	30	40	93	168	280	446
30	?	27	3	?	?	?	?	?	442

[smile85]

I race solo and this is what I see...

Screenshot_2018-05-22-17-02-35.jpg

[Sablob]

We are 2 and so far our goals have been 3, then 7 and now 13.

[cdosr]

We are 12 people, 4th goal is 66 tasks.

Sorry, I didn't record the first 3 goals.

[Robyn2123]

Started with 1 racers, first goal was 2 tasks. Added two racers (now 3 racers) and the first goal remained 2. Achieved first goal, all 3 racers got prize, and second goal is 8 tasks.

3 racers:
1st goal: ??
2nd goal: 8 tasks
3rd goal: 17 tasks

[Axo]

We are having similar discussion on Facebook. Some teams of the same size and league are being given different co-op reward amounts. We aren't sure if it's based on numbers that raced last week, global standing, random luck?
Golden League Team of 10 so far. 1 person was set to non racing, but left yesterday. She took one task left before finishing
Level 1=13
Level 2= 30
Level 3= 54
Level 4= 94
Level 5= 154

[Bessville]

Hmmm, if it’s simply overall coop size, and no reference is made to number of them set to Racing during this week (which makes sense, since Not Racing members can apparently still do tasks), then this penalises teams with long-dormant members. Hmmmm.

I personally think we should be able to make our own decisions about whether we want people in our coops to be able to take long sabbaticals.. don’t really like the game trying to dictate that. But ho hum, whatevs.

[kitty4715]

Hmmm, if it’s simply overall coop size, and no reference is made to number of them set to Racing during this week (which makes sense, since Not Racing members can apparently still do tasks), then this penalises teams with long-dormant members. Hmmmm.

Right now, I'm going off the assumption that it's simply co-op size (racing status means nothing). We have 2 non-racers right now that are working on tasks. However, Axo's comment throws in a complication. If people post conflicting info here, I'll edit the chart to include a range.

I agree with you about it being a bad way to determine the goals - I posted a similar comment in the other thread. It would mean anyone on your team that isn't doing tasks is hurting you, which really isn't right.

EDIT: RACING STATUS may be more influential than we think, given Chiosnic's post (#15). Plus obviously also some other factor(s) since people with potentially the same co-op sizes have reported different numbers. Potentially Playrix has an "acceptable range" for each co-op size and your goals are randomly generated within that range. Perhaps past performance is taken into account...etc...

[Downton]

We are team of 5 and so far we have had
First goal 8
Second goal 18
Third goal 32

[HelpersAllAboardSerenity]

10 members (one was marked as not racing if it matters)
1st goal: 11
2nd goal: 26
3rd goal: 48

Axo, were all 10 of yours marked as racing?